I currently work at a large company where I hold a niche role that is hard to fill. I've been recognized as a high performer, and the company has a strong pay equity culture. Over the past five years, I've noticed that when my department needs to hire, they often struggle to find the right candidates, which leads them to increase the salary band to attract talent. As a result, during salary equity audits, I typically receive a meaningful pay increase—usually around 8-10%, compared to the standard 3% for others. This is framed as both a pay increase and a pay equity adjustment. Recently, my former manager reached out and offered me a new position with a 20% pay increase and an annual bonus of 10-20%. The role is comparable to my current one, so I accepted the offer. My current employer attempted to counter, but they couldn't match the pay without triggering salary increases for the entire team, and they were unable to adjust my role to facilitate a higher pay. This situation has led me to ponder whether high performers like myself are at a disadvantage when it comes to pay equity, especially in a large organization that struggles to pivot quickly.
Loading comments…
Comments