I recently faced a tough situation after being denied unemployment benefits in California. I’ve been working at UCLA for about three years, and this summer was the first time I was put on furlough with zero hours. Previously, I had worked through the summers without any issues. The university informed us about the furlough before the summer started and assured us that we would have our jobs back afterward. However, the Employment Development Department (EDD) denied my claim, citing that I have 'reasonable assurance' of returning to work, which makes me ineligible for benefits during this period. I understand their reasoning, but it feels different this time since I’ve never been completely cut off from hours before. Going three months without any pay is really challenging. I’m trying to figure out my next steps—has anyone else been in a similar situation? Should I consider appealing the decision, or is it likely a lost cause due to the 'reasonable assurance' rule?