I had a final interview yesterday for a role I'm really excited about, and it lasted about three hours with four different interviewers. The first three interviews went really well; they were conversational, and I felt confident. One interviewer even praised me with comments like, "You're killing it" and "Wow, another great answer." However, the fourth interview was with the Recruiting & Development Manager, and it was a different experience. She was more serious and asked some tough behavioral questions. I answered all of them, but I felt nervous and didn't perform as well as I could have. I found myself rambling at times, and she had to prompt me for more details on a couple of my answers. By the end of the interview, I was mentally exhausted, and she acknowledged that it had been a long day for all of us. After the interviews, she went over the benefits package and explained the next steps, mentioning that the team would meet on Thursday to discuss candidates and hoped to have a decision by Friday. I sent personalized thank you emails to everyone afterward. The hiring manager responded positively, expressing appreciation for my interest in the role, while another interviewer said it was a pleasure meeting me and encouraged me to reach out with any questions. Now, I'm left wondering how much impact the weaker fourth interview might have on my overall candidacy. Does one less favorable interview carry significant weight compared to the others? When the team meets to discuss candidates, is the decision typically a collective one, or can one person's opinion sway the outcome? The responses I received to my thank you emails seemed standard, but do they indicate that my candidacy is still viewed positively? I'm trying to manage my expectations while I wait for their decision.