I recently accepted a job offer in New England and signed a letter of intent, which required me to relocate to a much smaller city. I gave notice at my current job, where I've been employed in a large city with a population of over 2 million. However, I've hit a snag with the new employer's HR department regarding my background check. During the second interview, I was informed that the role now requires self-travel in my own vehicle 2-3 days a week instead of the originally mentioned 1 day per week. Despite this change, I felt the position was a good fit and accepted the offer. Now, HR has flagged an issue with my driving record stemming from an accident that occurred 24 years ago. The accident was not my fault; I was involved in a situation where an older man suddenly stopped in front of me, claiming I rear-ended him, but the police did not issue me a ticket as it was clear I was not at fault. I later found out that my insurance paid him $35k without my knowledge. HR is saying that this old accident is a problem and that they need to meet with their committee to discuss it further. My employment is currently on hold until they make a decision. I’ve had multiple jobs over the last 20+ years, including roles with similar travel requirements, and this issue has never been raised before. I’m left wondering how long an employer can hold such an old incident against me and if this is a case of small-town mentality.
Loading comments…
Comments