I recently applied for a Management Analyst II position with my local city government, and I'm feeling a bit conflicted about being overqualified for the role. At 28 years old, I just completed my PhD in Economics, and while this position only requires a BS degree, the work genuinely interests me since it's in my home city. The posted salary for the role tops out at $65k, but given my extensive research, teaching, and analytical experience, I believe a salary in the $80-90k range would be more appropriate. My advisor even suggested asking for $100k, which seems a bit aggressive for a government position. I'm also contemplating whether I should inquire about being considered for a Management Analyst III or IV position instead, considering my qualifications. I don't want to come off as presumptuous, especially since I applied for the II role, but I feel it's worth raising the question. I recently received a verbal offer and am expecting the written offer soon, so I'm trying to navigate how best to handle the salary conversation without leaving too much on the table after all my years of education and work. Has anyone else dealt with similar situations in local government? Did asking for a higher grade level ever work out?
Company: local city government
Job title: Management Analyst II
Loading comments…
Comments